Governor Gavin Newsom is facing fresh fire from conservative critics. He secretly funded a bust of himself at San Francisco City Hall. The monument, meant to celebrate his mayoral tenure, has ignited fury.
A new book alleges Newsom used so-called “behested payments” to cover part of the $97,000 cost. This tactic lets politicians ask donors to chip in. Two companies owned by Newsom—Balboa Cafe Partners and PlumpJack Management Group—donated a total of $10,000. The funds funneled to a nonprofit earmarked for the bust have raised serious questions about transparency.
Newsom served as mayor of San Francisco from 2004 to 2011. His political climb has been marked by controversial moves. While he once stood by traditional liberal policies, he now courts conservative voices. His recent podcast features conservative figures like Charlie Kirk and Michael Savage. Critics say this is a bid to soften his image ahead of a 2028 White House run.
“I don’t want to call it embarrassing, but it’s a strange thing,” Newsom once remarked when the bust was being built.
The explosive book Fool’s Gold: The Radicals, Con Artists, and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All claims Newsom even diverted funds to projects run by his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. The book paints a picture of a governor more interested in immortalizing his own legacy than serving Californians. One critic slammed,
“Now I know what a narcissist is.” Another added, “This is peak leftist arrogance—worshiping their own failures while everyday Californians suffer under their disastrous policies.”
Newsom’s actions come at a time when he’s positioning himself for a potential 2028 presidential bid. His record as California’s governor—marked by expensive wildfires and controversial policy decisions—has drawn harsh scrutiny from conservatives. While California battles one of its worst wildfire disasters in recent memory, critics argue that Newsom’s focus on image-building over addressing state crises is unacceptable.
“If only he cared half as much about fixing his state as he does about immortalizing his own ego,” an enraged voter declared.
The scandal over the self-funded monument adds fuel to an already heated debate. For conservatives, it’s a stark example of self-serving politics. For Newsom supporters, it might be seen as an effort to celebrate a complex political journey. As the controversy grows, questions about accountability and transparency in government continue to mount.
DailyMail.com has reached out to Newsom for comment. As this story develops, many in California and beyond remain deeply divided over whether this monument is a tribute or a monument to vanity.
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Another politician been a legend on its own mind.As we all know is political thing and we all know how politicians are.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
I wonder if he\’s thinking like king saul who made a monument to himself only to be called out by samuel.
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
He should not have done it!
Vanity, vanity, vanity! All is vanity
He is so in love with himself !!!!!!