A fiery proposal to break away from the United States is gaining ground in California, with activists pushing a “Calexit” initiative that could reshape American history. The controversial measure, now cleared to gather signatures, would ask voters in 2028 if California should leave the Union and become a “free and independent country.”

This isn’t just another political stunt. If the bill moves forward, it could trigger seismic changes in California’s relationship with the federal government—starting with a symbolic removal of the American flag from state buildings.

A Radical Plan for Independence

The proposed ballot measure is explicit: It calls for a statewide vote to declare California’s independence from the United States. But the bill’s requirements are strict:

  • At least 50% of registered voters must turn out for the election.
  • A supermajority of 55% must approve the measure for it to pass.

If those thresholds are met, the bill mandates the creation of a 20-member commission to study the logistics of independence. This group would deliver a comprehensive report by 2027, detailing how California could function as a sovereign nation.

The measure would also formally declare a “vote of no confidence” in the United States and, in a provocative move, demand that all U.S. flags be removed from state buildings.

The Man Behind the Movement

The Calexit campaign is spearheaded by Fresno-based activist Marcus Evans, who has long argued that California is being suffocated by Washington politics.

“This is the moment we’ve been waiting for,” Evans said in a fiery statement. “California has the resources, the talent, and the will to stand on its own. It’s time to put the decision in the hands of the people.”

Evans previously attempted a similar initiative in 2016 but failed to gain traction. This time, he believes the political climate is ripe for change.

Critics Slam the Proposal

Not everyone is on board. Critics argue that the bill is impractical, divisive, and financially reckless. The proposed commission would cost taxpayers at least $10 million upfront, with $2 million in annual costs.

“This isn’t about independence—it’s a waste of money and a distraction from real issues,” said Republican strategist Laura Bennett. “California can’t even handle its budget, let alone the responsibilities of nationhood.”

A Dangerous Gamble?

The economic risks are staggering. While California boasts the world’s fifth-largest economy, it relies heavily on federal funding for infrastructure, disaster relief, and defense. Independence would also raise questions about citizenship, trade agreements, and the state’s military obligations.

“This isn’t a simple breakup,” said political analyst James Carter. “It’s a messy divorce with no guarantee of success. Californians need to think long and hard about what they’re giving up.”

A Symbol of Growing Division

The Calexit bill has reignited debates about the widening rift between California and the rest of the country. Supporters see it as a bold step toward self-determination, while opponents view it as an unpatriotic assault on national unity.

Even some Democrats are distancing themselves from the proposal. Governor Gavin Newsom called the initiative “a distraction,” emphasizing the importance of focusing on California’s immediate challenges.

What’s Next?

The campaign has until July 22 to collect enough signatures to place the measure on the ballot. If successful, Californians could cast a historic vote in 2028—one that might alter the course of the state and the nation forever.

Supporters claim it’s time for California to assert its independence. Opponents warn it’s a dangerous gamble. Either way, the fight for Calexit is just beginning.


Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

13 thoughts on “California to Leave to Us with New ‘Calexit’ Bill?”
  1. Well if majority feel that way, go for it…you will save other Americans a lot of money. Except we will have to build a wall to keep illegals out…

  2. It wouldn’t take long for the cartel to take them over. Then we’d have to bail them out again.

  3. We would save a lot on social security. No one there will be paid anymore. Tell that to the elderly. Dumb move.

  4. That sounds like a helluva an idea. If they do that it would be the best thing ever so then they could stop trying to get the rest of the country to be like they are.

  5. California is horrible to even suggest such a proposal. The only people who want that are socialist/communist/marxist democrats/rinos. No way will they ever gain the majority to do it.

    Ernie Mink Aurora, Colorado

  6. California is BEAUTIFUL!ITS JUST THE MAN WHO DID NOT KNOW HIS AS FROM AS HOLE IN THE GROUND!OUT DAM SPOT!NEED WATER…..Sent from Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

Leave a Reply to David NeeseCancel reply

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading